Askmoses-A Jews Resource
If I am not a believer, can I still use the Ten Commandments as an ethical base?
Browse our archives

The Scholar is ready to answer your question. Click the button below to chat now.


Scholar Online:

Type in your question here:

What are the halachic implications of cloning humans?

by Rabbi Tzvi Freeman

  

Library » Intimacy » Reproductive Issues | Subscribe | What is RSS?


PRINT EMAIL COMMENT

A thorough and highly informative paper on this subject can be found at http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/cloning.html.

As in all issues of human progress this too is a double-edged sword. The major points:

1. There do not appear to be any substantial arguments to forbid cloning from a Halachic perspective.

2. There is good reason to proceed cautiously in any matter this radical, principally due to unknown factors and the possibility of abuse. Dr. Rabbi Moshe Tendler states that we are too close to the specter of Nazi 'medicine' to be assured that human beings will be responsible in this regard. Dr. Velvl Greene, an observant Jew who was initially involved in the Genome Project, states that he left the project after hearing the director's comments concerning the project's possible benefits. The director suggested that a newly born fetus not be named for the first four months, so that it could be terminated if its genetic material appeared deficient.

3. There are some very positive benefits to be seen from cloning. For example, a parent with leukemia may have a child who will be able to provide bone marrow to save his life at a later date.

TAGS: clone, clones, cloning

ADD A COMMENT

Please email me when new comments are posted (you must be  logged in).

COMMENTS

Cloning

Posted by: Brian on Aug 08, 2005

thou shalt not make unto thyself any graven image of anything on the land, heaven or sea.

isn't a clone a graven image, not just made of clay, but made of flesh, DNA, and all the other components of human life since it comes from a source other than the natural birth process which basically defines what life is? If something comes to be and doesn't come from a natural process of formation, is it not a replica of what it's being formed from? It would even make sense that a clone is a mockery of the creation of mankind. Who knows if any medical benefits that come from clones will actually be directly applicable to real humans?

Editor's Comment

This prohibition does not apply to live beings.

Well duh!

Posted by: Mike on Aug 29, 2005

Of course it doesnt apply to living beings! Otherwise the human race would haved been very short lived.

RELATED CATEGORIES

Life Cycle » Birth » Reproductive Issues

Halachic
Pertaining to Jewish Law.